Solidarity?... Can you have it both ways?

Felloffasofa

.. Some would say that Jacinda Ardern is showing such strong leadership following the tragedy in Christchurch. I agree, we can see and feel a subtle tyranny gripping the freedoms of the people of New Zealand.

An example: she has slipped a new social/behavioral engineering phrase into the propaganda airways and it goes like this...

" We will be more deliberate with our words " Jacinda says.

What the hell does that mean anyway?, it's so cryeeptic?... and did she deliberately forget to add the words "...OR ELSE! "... maybe?

So here we are, waiting for the next step in the road to 1984... the censorship of speech. It's right outside... will Jacinda bring it in?... maybe, and if she does she'll introduce it as a good thing for us and the right thing to do to protect the innocent and the vulnerable.
How to achieve this?.. perhaps Let's do this by force?... or Let's do this by threatening the New Zealand people with 10 Years of jail time if we are not "deliberate" enough with our words?

This sounds like another creepy step in fulfilling the United Nations Agenda 2030 plan... didn't she just deliberately sign the UN Immigration Compact recently without agreement of the people of New Zealand?... non-binding you said... ha!, I doubt it.

And please stop saying "Us" and "We" when you are making decisions as if we all agree with what you are doing to New Zealand... you forget, the majority of US did not vote for YOU. We do not want to be your comrade - especially when you are dictating.

Hold on to your butts people, this 1984 party is going to get wild.

Felloffasofa

We have new developments in the War on Syria and its leader Assad. It seems the breakaway "Free-Syria Army" (aka Al Qaeda Rebels) who have been waging a 3 year campaign to topple the Syrian Government have run out of steam... or are they just getting old and the story worn. The West have been sitting back, waiting for the Assad regime to fold but it has not happened yet.

Has it been the West's plan to back the Rebels since they certainly haven't supported Assad? Instead they've consistently demonised Assad in the media... Lybia style. So what will they try now?....

Plan B... drive a newly created "Terror" force onto Syrian territory then launch air-strikes on Syrian infrastructure which they can easily claim is held by the Islamic State Terrorists and these actions will help Assad. So let me get this straight, we are helping get rid of these supposedly dug-in enemies by bombing the people we are now trying to help? 

Never mind that the very act of waging war in another Sovereign State without the invitation for military aid by that State or with the agreement of the UN Security Council to engage in obvious "Self-defence" is ILLEGAL.

When international law gets in the way of your own agenda, war crimes don't matter especially when it's not happening in your country.

This Syrian steak is smelling awfully fishy!

Felloffasofa

With all the happenings surrounding the Syrian conflict, it makes me wonder what truths we are getting from this constantly evolving story.
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Barack Obama, is pushing hard for an end to the conflict in Syria and helps to wield the Al Qaeda packed Rebel Army against the Assad "Regime". Ironic how within one decade the US Military will back the proponents of the very organisation it accused of committing the 911 attacks. It's a familiar story to the destruction of Lybia.

The pro-war rhetoric is flowing thick and fast - and the blame for the use of chemical weapons for killing Syrian Civilians will squarely land on the "guilty" party. Who makes these kinds of weapons anyway?

It's the same story, different country!... I just wonder how long it will take for the "Free Syrian Army" to establish a new Rothschild Central bank.

Felloffasofa